Plot
A San Francisco cartoonist becomes an amateur detective obsessed with tracking down the Zodiac killer.
Release Year: 2007
Rating: 7.8/10 (132,487 voted)
Critic's Score: 78/100
Director:
David Fincher
Stars: Jake Gyllenhaal, Robert Downey Jr., Mark Ruffalo
Storyline A serial killer in the San Francisco Bay Area taunts police with his letters and cryptic messages. We follow the investigators and reporters in this lightly fictionalized account of the true 1970's case as they search for the murderer, becoming obsessed with the case. Based on Robert Graysmith's book, the movie's focus is the lives and careers of the detectives and newspaper people.
Writers: James Vanderbilt, Robert Graysmith
Cast: Jake Gyllenhaal
-
Robert Graysmith
Mark Ruffalo
-
Inspector David Toschi
Anthony Edwards
-
Inspector William Armstrong
Robert Downey Jr.
-
Paul Avery
Brian Cox
-
Melvin Belli
John Carroll Lynch
-
Arthur Leigh Allen
Richmond Arquette
-
Zodiac 1
/
Zodiac 2
Bob Stephenson
-
Zodiac 3
John Lacy
-
Zodiac 4
Chloë Sevigny
-
Melanie
Ed Setrakian
-
Al Hyman
John Getz
-
Templeton Peck
John Terry
-
Charles Thieriot
Candy Clark
-
Carol Fisher
Elias Koteas
-
Sgt. Jack Mulanax
Taglines:
Based on the true story of America's most notorious serial killer.
Filming Locations: 4th Street, Downtown, Los Angeles, California, USA
Box Office Details
Budget: $65,000,000
(estimated)
Opening Weekend: $13,395,610
(USA)
(4 March 2007)
Gross: $33,048,353
(USA)
(29 April 2007)
Technical Specs
Runtime:|
(director's cut)
Did You Know?
Trivia: Ione Skye appears in this movie in an uncredited cameo. "Hurdy Gurdy Man", by her father, Donovan, is used prominently in the soundtrack.
Goofs:
Anachronisms:
The computers shown in a scene from the early 70s were DEC computers made in the early 80s.
Quotes:
[first lines]
Mike Mageau:
Where have you been? I've been waiting since 7:00.
User Review
Not Your Average Serial Killer Movie (And That's a Good Thing)
Rating: 9/10
"Zodiac" may frustrate viewers who come to David Fincher's latest film
expecting a traditional serial killer thriller. The film begins with a
couple of hair-raising and rather brutal recreations of murders carried
out by the mysterious killer who terrorized the San Francisco Bay area
in the late 1960s and early 1970s. These early scenes are shocking and,
compared to the rest of the film, disorienting, because they offer the
only time that we come close to seeing events from the killer's
perspective. As the film progresses, the Zodiac killer himself fades
into the background, and the movie turns into a meticulous and
engrossing document of the investigation to track him down, an
investigation that includes countless blind alleys and false clues and
which to this day has not reached a conclusion. I would be more prone
to label the somewhat rambling screenplay as sloppy storytelling if I
did not feel that Fincher tells the story exactly as he wants to. The
elusive narrative works, because the film is about an elusive villain.
Jake Gyllenhaal plays Robert Graysmith, a cartoonist working for the
"San Francisco Chronicle" at the time the Zodiac killer began his
gruesome work. He becomes fascinated by the case, and takes it on as a
sort of morbid personal hobby long after the police department has
given it up as a lost cause. Graysmith eventually wrote the book on
which this film is based, and according to his accounts, he discovered
enough evidence about one of the suspects in the case to put the police
back on his trail years after he'd been cleared for lack of evidence.
Other characters come and go. Robert Downey, Jr. does
characteristically terrific work as a reporter at the "Chronicle" who
grabs his own portion of notoriety through his involvement in the case.
Mark Ruffalo and Anthony Edwards play the two detectives in charge of
the investigation. Chloe Sevigny plays Gyllenhaal's put-upon wife, who
gradually loses her husband to his obsession. All of the actors deliver
thrilling performances, many of them against the odds. Since this isn't
a character driven movie, many of the characters remain undeveloped,
but not, for once, to the detriment of the film. This story isn't about
the people involved, but rather about their role in the Zodiac saga;
once they've served their purpose, Fincher dispenses with them.
Ironically, a film that clocks in at nearly 3 hours exhibits a great
deal of narrative economy.
Parts of "Zodiac" are intensely creepy. Fincher effectively uses the
rainy San Francisco atmosphere to its maximum potential, and the grimy
browns and grays of the production design call to mind Fincher's other
well-known films, like "Seven" and "Fight Club." But "Zodiac" is much
more grown up than those films, and for an audience to enjoy it, it has
to have an attention span. Long scenes are given to analyzing
handwriting samples, recreating the scenes of murders, digging through
newspaper clippings and files. You can tell that Fincher is fascinated
by police work in the pre-CSI era, when fax machines were still a novel
invention. He delves into the investigative process with a nearly
fetishistic attention to detail, but he makes all of it endlessly
mesmerizing. He does his best to bring everything to some sort of
conclusion, but the real-life end to the story makes a complete
conclusion impossible. This film is more about the journey than the
destination, and what a journey it is.
0